Buderus v. Munchkin v. Weil Mclean v. Burnham

Posted by Randy Guse on June 16, 2004 at 15:29:20:

I am in the process of having an old Hydro-therm boiler replaced. I have had four contractors in and two more scheduled for estimates. Two contractors have recommended Weil-Mclean, one Munchkin or Buderus and one Buderus. I am pretty sure that one of the two remaining contractors will recommend Burnham. I am going to go with an indirect water heater as well. Price-wise all the estimate so far are in the same ballpark so it is really coming down to a question of quality. Condensing or not? Cast iron v. stainless steel v. aluminum? Any recommendations and/or thoughts are welcome.

Follow Ups:

• Re: Buderus v. Munchkin v. Weil Mclean v. Burnham Randy Guse 07:13:28 6/17/2004 (4)
  • Re: Buderus v. Munchkin v. Weil Mclean v. Burnham hydronicnetwork.net 13:10:38 6/19/2004 (3)
    • Re: Buderus v. Munchkin v. Weil Mclean v. Burnham Randy 07:33:11 6/22/2004 (0)
    • Re: Buderus v. Munchkin v. Weil Mclean v. Burnham Randy 07:26:17 6/22/2004 (0)
    • Re: Buderus v. Munchkin v. Weil Mclean v. Burnham Randy Guse 08:44:34 6/21/2004 (0)
• Re: Buderus v. Munchkin v. Weil Mclean v. Burnham Dave 05:23:33 6/17/2004 (3)
  • Re: Buderus v. Munchkin v. Weil Mclean v. Burnham Dave 10:08:05 6/17/2004 (2)
    • Re: Buderus v. Munchkin v. Weil Mclean v. Burnham Joe 23:27:30 6/20/2004 (1)
      • Re: Buderus v. Munchkin v. Weil Mclean v. Burnham Randy Guse 09:11:55 6/21/2004 (0)

Post a Followup